END OF COURSE SURVEY RESULTS
Course: HRM6003 Group: MSM6 11/10/05-01/05/06
Strategic Programming in Human Resources Management
Faculty: Ronald K Bolender
Respondents/Registered: 5/10 50.0%

CURRICULUM
1. Course objectives were clearly presented. 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Strongly Disagree
(1)
0
Disagree
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
2
Agree
(4)
3
Strongly Agree
(5)
4.600
Average
2. The materials used were useful in attaining course objectives. 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Strongly Disagree
(1)
0
Disagree
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
1
Agree
(4)
4
Strongly Agree
(5)
4.800
Average
3. The topics discussed in class addressed major events and/or current issues in the field. 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Strongly Disagree
(1)
0
Disagree
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
2
Agree
(4)
3
Strongly Agree
(5)
4.600
Average
4. Based on the information provided in the curricular materials, knowledge and understanding of the subject were improved, as demonstrated through the practical application in the work setting/environment? 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Strongly Disagree
(1)
0
Disagree
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
3
Agree
(4)
2
Strongly Agree
(5)
4.400
Average
5. Approximately how many hours per week were devoted to homework assignments? 0
No Answer
(0)
1
0-5
(1)
2
6 - 10
(2)
2
11 - 15
(3)
0
16 - 20
(4)
0
Over 20
(5)
2.200
Average
(6 - 10)
6. What is your overall rating of the course? 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Very Poor
(1)
0
Poor
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
1
Good
(4)
4
Excellent
(5)
4.800
Average

FACULTY MEMBER
7. The faculty member provided written grading criteria during the first class. 0
No Answer
5
Yes
0
No

 
8. The faculty member used the materials contained in the course to help achieve the stated course outcomes. 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Strongly Disagree
(1)
0
Disagree
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
2
Agree
(4)
3
Strongly Agree
(5)
4.600
Average
9. The faculty member clearly and thoroughly discussed the key course topics. 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Strongly Disagree
(1)
0
Disagree
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
2
Agree
(4)
3
Strongly Agree
(5)
4.600
Average
10. The faculty member provided timely and relevant feedback. 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Strongly Disagree
(1)
0
Disagree
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
1
Agree
(4)
4
Strongly Agree
(5)
4.800
Average
11. The faculty member encouraged student contributions during class discussions. 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Strongly Disagree
(1)
0
Disagree
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
0
Agree
(4)
5
Strongly Agree
(5)
5.000
Average
12. The faculty member established a rapport with the class. 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Strongly Disagree
(1)
0
Disagree
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
1
Agree
(4)
4
Strongly Agree
(5)
4.800
Average
13. What is your overall rating of this faculty member's performance? 0
No Opinion
(0)
0
Very Poor
(1)
0
Poor
(2)
0
Neutral
(3)
1
Good
(4)
4
Excellent
(5)
4.800
Average

STUDY GROUPS
14. Did you participate in a group project in this course? 1
No Answer
1
Yes
3
No
15. If so, did the group experience assist in learning and applying class concepts? 4
No Answer
1
Yes
0
No

ADMINISTRATIVE
16. When you contacted the Adult and Graduate Studies office, were you served promptly and courteously? 2
No Answer
3
Yes
0
No

COMMENTS
What did you like best about the curriculum? Least?
1. Learned topics that currently can apply during my job now.
2. It certainly gave me a better grounding in HR concepts. This course really made me do heavy research which exposed me to aspects of real life issues. If the course was not constructed in the manner in which it was, I never would have had this valuable experience.
3. Best - The discussion about Labor Management Relations in the fifth week. Least- 2nd Writing Assignment
4. I really enjoyed the online access (blackboard) with electronic grading/discussion topics
 
Please identify any strengths of the faculty member's performance. Weaknesses.
1. Good at including all members of the class and limit excessive comments in class discussions. Organizational skills helped.
2. Instructor was very knowledgable about the issues and had great insight about practical applications to the approaches discussed.
3. Not only does this instructor have a thorough knowledge of his subject, he enjoys it too!