|
Devry University University Survey - SIFF - SUMB08_SEP08: Survey Summary Detailed Report with Write-In Responses SOCS335ON_A Bolender Workplace Culture and Communication SUMB08 - Sec A Ronald Bolender |
|||||||||
| 1. Stated course objectives clearly in the syllabus or in class. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 12 (52%) | 9 (39%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.43 | 0.66 | |||
| 2. Made the syllabus, instruction, homework, and exams consistent with the course objectives. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 12 (52%) | 10 (43%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.48 | 0.59 | |||
| 3. Used course assignments which promoted learning. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 12 (52%) | 8 (35%) | 2 (9%) | 1 (4%) | 23 | 3.35 | 0.83 | |||
| 4. Seemed knowledgeable about the topics covered in class. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 13 (57%) | 9 (39%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.52 | 0.59 | |||
| 5. Showed positive regard for students. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 14 (61%) | 8 (35%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.57 | 0.59 | |||
| 6. Showed enthusiasm in teaching. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 13 (57%) | 7 (30%) | 3 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.43 | 0.73 | |||
| 7. Was accessible and approachable outside of class (office hours, email, phone). | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 13 (57%) | 9 (39%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.52 | 0.59 | |||
| 8. Maintained a supportive and appropriate learning atmosphere. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 12 (52%) | 9 (39%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.43 | 0.66 | |||
| 9. Made the course interesting and challenging. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 11 (48%) | 10 (43%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.39 | 0.66 | |||
| 10. Used practical and relevant examples when appropriate. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 13 (57%) | 8 (35%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.48 | 0.67 | |||
| 11. Used textbook and/or lab materials effectively. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 12 (52%) | 9 (39%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.43 | 0.66 | |||
| 12. Delivered the course in a clear and structured manner. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 11 (48%) | 11 (48%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.43 | 0.59 | |||
| 13. Included valuable supplemental material such as audio-visual aids and lab activities. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 9 (39%) | 12 (52%) | 1 (4%) | 1 (4%) | 23 | 3.26 | 0.75 | |||
| 14. Provided opportunities to develop research skills and use the library. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (43%) | 11 (48%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.35 | 0.65 | |||
| 15. Used supplemental resources as appropriately needed, such as web-links, readings etc. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (43%) | 11 (48%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.35 | 0.65 | |||
| 16. Encouraged active participation of students through discussions, team work, speeches, etc. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 13 (57%) | 9 (39%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.52 | 0.59 | |||
| 17. Graded in a consistent and fair manner using clear criteria. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 12 (52%) | 8 (35%) | 3 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.39 | 0.72 | |||
| 18. Provided timely and specific feedback on assignments and tests. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 13 (57%) | 8 (35%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.48 | 0.67 | |||
| 19. Regularly communicated about my progress in the course. (online gradebook, conferences, progress reports, etc.) | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 11 (48%) | 9 (39%) | 2 (9%) | 1 (4%) | 23 | 3.3 | 0.82 | |||
| 20. Overall instructor rating. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 11 (48%) | 9 (39%) | 3 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.35 | 0.71 | |||
| 21. Degree of new knowledge and skills acquired in the course. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 8 (35%) | 12 (52%) | 3 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.22 | 0.67 | |||
| 22. Overall course rating. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 9 (39%) | 10 (43%) | 4 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.22 | 0.74 | |||
| 23. How many total hours each week did you spend outside of the Threaded Discussion Area? | |||||||||
| Less than 1 hour | 1 to 4 hours | 4 to 8 hours | 8 to 12 hours | 12 to 15 hours | More than 15 hours | ||||
| 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |
| 1 (4%) | 4 (17%) | 11 (48%) | 2 (9%) | 2 (9%) | 3 (13%) | 23 | 3.61 | 1.37 | |
| 24. How would you grade your instructor's ability to accomplish the Terminal Course Objectives of this course? | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 12 (52%) | 10 (43%) | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 23 | 3.48 | 0.59 | |||
| 25. What were the instructor's major strengths? | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * na | |||||||||
| * Easy to get in touch with. Answered any questions needed. | |||||||||
| * Constant feedback | |||||||||
| * N/A | |||||||||
| * Replying back to the students. | |||||||||
| * Very well informed. Good feedback and helpful. | |||||||||
| * Discussions | |||||||||
| * Teaching | |||||||||
| * .. | |||||||||
| * Great instructor. Good communications and strong strength for the class knowlege | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * Discussions | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * great feedback | |||||||||
| * Motivating students. | |||||||||
| * Provided excellent guidance through the discussions that promoted thoughtful responses from the entire class. | |||||||||
| * Communication with students. | |||||||||
| * Guided the students very well in the discussions. Also called me personally. | |||||||||
| * none | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * easy to follow | |||||||||
| * Quick response | |||||||||
| 26. What aspects of instruction require improvement? | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * na | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * Positive feedback. | |||||||||
| * N/A | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * none | |||||||||
| * none | |||||||||
| * Having knowledge that not every student works at a job or that they do not have play groups or communities that they can write a paper about Ethnographic Research. Changing the course project would be best for those that do not work. | |||||||||
| * Nothing | |||||||||
| * Nothing | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * Timing as far as assignments and reports being required the same week as exams | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * none | |||||||||
| * He is pretty good with what he does.Any thing he feels will be of help to the student in future classes he can add to the course. | |||||||||
| * Some more instructions to clarify exactly what the professor expects would be beneficial, although this wasn't a significant issue. | |||||||||
| * nothing | |||||||||
| * none | |||||||||
| * none | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * develop more of a rapport with the students . . . make the lessons more interesting | |||||||||
| * None come to mind | |||||||||