|
Devry University University Survey - SIFF - SPRB09_MAY09: Survey Summary Detailed Report with Write-In Responses SOCS335ON_B Bolender Workplace Culture and Communication SPRB09 - Sec B Ronald Bolender |
|||||||||
| 25. What were the instructor's major strengths?
|
|||||||||
| * Very approachable and always willing to provide constructive criticisms. | |||||||||
| * Very knowledgeable about the topic and provided great tools to use to learn the material. | |||||||||
| * great instructor overall | |||||||||
| * all | |||||||||
| * Great a communication | |||||||||
| * He was available when needed | |||||||||
| * Knowledge of the material to be learned and the ability to get people involved in discussions. | |||||||||
| * Very active in threads. Good at responded to individual threads and asking us questions for further response. Also, combining text materials to everyday situations. | |||||||||
| * teaching | |||||||||
| * ability to get the student to think... | |||||||||
| * Enthusiasm for the material, high regard and encouragement for students and gave a lot of examples to make the material more understandable. | |||||||||
| * Professor Bolender was able to follow the TCOs while making them and the discussions relevant and easy to follow. | |||||||||
| 26. What aspects of instruction require improvement?
|
|||||||||
| * Absolutely none! | |||||||||
| * none | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * all | |||||||||
| * none come to mind | |||||||||
| * none | |||||||||
| * I can't think of any improvements. | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * none | |||||||||
| * n/a | |||||||||
| * N/A | |||||||||
| * None | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| 1. Stated course objectives clearly in the syllabus or in class. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 9 (75%) | 3 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.75 | 0.45 | |||
| 2. Made the syllabus, instruction, homework, and exams consistent with the course objectives. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 3. Used course assignments which promoted learning. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 8 (67%) | 4 (33%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.67 | 0.49 | |||
| 4. Seemed knowledgeable about the topics covered in class. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 5. Showed positive regard for students. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 6. Showed enthusiasm in teaching. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 7. Was accessible and approachable outside of class (office hours, email, phone). | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 8. Maintained a supportive and appropriate learning atmosphere. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 9. Made the course interesting and challenging. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 10. Used practical and relevant examples when appropriate. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 11. Used textbook and/or lab materials effectively. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 12. Delivered the course in a clear and structured manner. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 13. Included valuable supplemental material such as audio-visual aids and lab activities. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 14. Provided opportunities to develop research skills and use the library. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||
| 15. Used supplemental resources as appropriately needed, such as web-links, readings etc. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 9 (75%) | 3 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.75 | 0.45 | |||
| 16. Encouraged active participation of students through discussions, team work, speeches, etc. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 9 (75%) | 3 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.75 | 0.45 | |||
| 17. Graded in a consistent and fair manner using clear criteria. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 9 (75%) | 3 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.75 | 0.45 | |||
| 18. Provided timely and specific feedback on assignments and tests. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 9 (75%) | 3 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.75 | 0.45 | |||
| 19. Regularly communicated about my progress in the course. (online gradebook, conferences, progress reports, etc.) | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 9 (75%) | 3 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.75 | 0.45 | |||
| 20. Overall instructor rating. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 9 (75%) | 3 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.75 | 0.45 | |||
| 21. Degree of new knowledge and skills acquired in the course. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 7 (58%) | 5 (42%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.58 | 0.51 | |||
| 22. Overall course rating. | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 8 (67%) | 4 (33%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.67 | 0.49 | |||
| 23. How many total hours each week did you spend outside of the Threaded Discussion Area? | |||||||||
| Less than 1 hour | 1 to 4 hours | 4 to 8 hours | 8 to 12 hours | 12 to 15 hours | More than 15 hours | ||||
| 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |
| 0 (0%) | 2 (17%) | 7 (58%) | 1 (8%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.75 | 0.97 | |
| 24. How would you grade your instructor's ability to accomplish the Terminal Course Objectives of this course? | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | n | Mean | STD | |||
| 10 (83%) | 2 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 12 | 3.83 | 0.39 | |||